Bertie Kingore, Ph.D.
1. Do
your identification instruments and strategies
include multiple criteria that measure students'
abilities in each area of giftedness relevant to
the district's definition and services? In other
words, are you eliciting the characteristics you
intend to serve? . 2. Does
the identification process produce information that
is useful in instruction and promotes the needs of
all students? . 3. Does
the identification process occur early enough to
maximize for students the benefits that may be
obtained from special programs? . 4. Does
the identification process delineate and provide
reoccurring opportunities to screen students not
yet identified? . 5. Are
the identification instruments and strategies
appropriate for the specific needs and
characteristics of the age levels, economic levels,
diverse cultures, and special populations
represented within your district? . 6. Are
the standardized tests reliable and valid for your
multi-ethnic population and for students likely to
perform at levels far beyond those expected for
their age group? . 7. Are
all identification instruments and materials
available in each of the languages represented by
the diverse ethnic groups in the
district? . 8. Does
the identification system consider qualitative
information from a variety of people most familiar
with the students' needs, abilities, and
behaviors? . 9. Does
your identification system endeavor to balance any
limitations of one criterion with the strengths of
another criterion? . 10. Recognizing
the limitation of a single score on any measure,
can a student qualify for the program despite a low
score on one criterion if performance is
appropriately strong on other criteria? . 11. Can
the identification process realistically be
accomplished with the time, staff, and funds
available? What training or changes are
needed? . 12. Is
the identification process and time line clearly
explained in a written form and readily available
to all? . 13. Are
all members of the identification committee trained
in the nature and needs of gifted
students? . 14. Is
everyone on the identification committee prepared
to recognize the limitation of matrices, review
accumulated data, and interpret specific needs
before final decisions are reached so that
placements are based on students' needs rather than
numbers who can be served? Action plan:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kingore, B. (Spring 2000). Determining appropriate identification criteria: A self study.Tempo, XX (2), 12. www.bertiekingore.com |